I have always enjoyed TV quiz shows going right back to Crackerjack and through to the current crop which includes Only Connect, Mastermind, Pointless and, of course Richard Osman’s House of Games.
There have been many others over the years, including Take Your Pick and Double Your Money, University Challenge, Impossible, Tipping Point, Eggheads . . . well the list goes on and on.
Obviously in the early days I watched the shows which matched my education, which is why I kicked off with Crackerjack. It was not long before I began to watch TV panel shows, such as What’s My Line and Call My Bluff.
Not long after moving to grammar school a new quiz programme began on ITV (which will probably surprise some readers) called University Challenge. A programme which hit the spot because I was looking beyond the sort of questions that cropped up in Crackerjack and other “kiddies” shows. Even Take A Letter with Robert Holness (later to be Bob Holness of Blockbusters), didn’t cut the mustard.
I don’t claim to have been able to answer all the questions but it did keep my mind going and I learned a lot from the university students’ answers.
I continued to watch UC whenever I could but time in Australia and then the Middle East did not prepare me for my final return to the UK in 1988 to discover University Challenge had been dropped by ITV the year before I came home.
There were other quiz shows and I used to watch as many as I could, depending on work. Being on a weekly paper by then I did have more of a normal home life so could watch the evening shows.
Over the years the quiz shows on TV proliferated, including the return of University Challenge in the 1990s, on BBC, and eventually I reached a point where I had to ration myself.
I now watch University Challenge, Mastermind, Only Connect, Pointless and Richard Osman’s House of Games.
They are an interesting collection, based on the contestants, ranging from academia and UC (now hosted by someone whose name I can never remember – just looked it up and it’s Amol Rajan who was preceded by Jeremy Paxman even though I still expect them to say Bamber Gascoigne) to Only Connect, Mastermind and Pointless with “ordinary people” as contestants.
The “ordinary contestant” shows can make you feel good with yourself if you get more questions right than the people on the show. I doubt that ordinary viewers do better than the university teams and I am sure that the questions there have become harder.
The only quiz show on my list which doesn’t use “ordinary people” is Richard Osman’s House of Games, which only has celebrities as contestants but has an amazing array of rounds covering the range from rhyming answers right up to high-brow/lowbrow questions.
Some game shows do, however, also have a celebrity version, such as Mastermind Celebrities and Pointless Celebrities. Although when I say celebrities apparently the bar for these shows is somewhat lower than I am happy about.
Now you probably know the basics of Mastermind, There are four contestants who each in turn have to sit in a black chair and answer questions from Clive Myrie,
First time around they are quizzed on their specialist subject – which is normally for about a minute and a half and tends to be 12 questions.
In this section most ordinary contestants get between eight and 12 points.
In the second half each contestant gets two and a half minutes on general knowledge and tend to score from 7 to 14 points.
Occasionally you get a contestant who scores badly on their specialist questions and even on general knowledge, but these are rare and final points on a round could be 16 to 24.
When you get celebrities, however, they frequently end up with zero to four on the first round because they pick a subject they think they know all about and are then faced with questions which they cannot answer.
Then they move on to general knowledge and find they don’t know any answers there either. I have not yet seen a zero score at the end of both rounds but with some of the celebrities they dig up it might not be fa/0r away,
When it comes to Pointless the celebrity version is grimly similar.
Here they come in pairs and are often oddly mixed and a sports person might end up with a newsreader as partner.
Their general knowledge might be totally disparate and one might get a low score (good in this game) and the other gets it completely wrong meaning they get the maximum points that round and have to leave the quiz.
From this watching of quiz shows I have come to the conclusion that most members of the public have an average IQ score far in advance of the average celebrity.
The good thing about quiz shows is that it sometimes helps your own general knowledge and often makes you feel smug.